{\rtf1\mac\ansicpg10000\uc1 \deff0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\upr{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset256\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f3\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 02000500000000000000}Symbol;}
{\f4\fnil\fcharset256\fprq2{\*\panose 02000500000000000000}Times;}{\f7\fnil\fcharset256\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0503030404040204}Geneva;}{\f12\fnil\fcharset256\fprq2{\*\panose 02020502060305060204}New York;}
}{\*\ud{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset256\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f3\fnil\fcharset2\fprq2{\*\panose 02000500000000000000}Symbol;}{\f4\fnil\fcharset256\fprq2{\*\panose 02000500000000000000}Times;}
{\f7\fnil\fcharset256\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0503030404040204}Geneva;}{\f12\fnil\fcharset256\fprq2{\*\panose 02020502060305060204}New York;}}}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255;\red0\green255\blue0;
\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0;\red128\green128\blue128;
\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\widctlpar\adjustright \f7\cgrid \snext0 Normal;}{\s1\keepn\widctlpar\adjustright \b\fs20\cgrid \sbasedon0 \snext0 heading 1;}{\*\cs10 \additive Default Paragraph Font;}{\s15\widctlpar
\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\adjustright \f7\cgrid \sbasedon0 \snext15 footer;}{\s16\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\adjustright \f7\cgrid \sbasedon0 \snext16 header;}{\*\cs17 \additive \sbasedon10 page number;}{\s18\widctlpar\adjustright \f12\cgrid 
\sbasedon0 \snext18 sp3;}{\s19\qc\sl480\slmult0\widctlpar\adjustright \b\f4\fs28\cgrid \sbasedon0 \snext19 Headings;}{\s20\qj\fi360\sl480\slmult0\widctlpar\adjustright \f4\fs28\cgrid \sbasedon0 \snext20 Paragraph;}{\s21\fi-1800\li1800\ri-540\widctlpar
\tx720\tx1340\tx1800\tx8900\adjustright \f7\cgrid \sbasedon0 \snext21 agenda;}{\s22\li900\ri-720\widctlpar\tx3860\adjustright \f4\cgrid \sbasedon0 \snext22 CINDY;}{\s23\ri-900\widctlpar\tx6840\tx7280\tx8460\tx9080\tx9440\tx10520\adjustright 
\b\f7\fs20\ul\cgrid \sbasedon0 \snext23 index;}{\s24\widctlpar\adjustright \f12\fs20\cgrid \sbasedon0 \snext24 page number2;}{\s25\fi-720\li720\ri-720\widctlpar\tx540\tx720\tx7100\tx7740\tx8460\tx9260\tx10620\adjustright \f7\fs20\cgrid 
\sbasedon23 \snext25 index2;}{\s26\ri-900\widctlpar\tx7020\tx8460\tx9080\tx9440\tx10520\adjustright \b\f7\fs20\cgrid \sbasedon0 \snext26 index heading;}{\s27\li2160\widctlpar\adjustright \f4\cgrid \sbasedon0 \snext27 Body Text 2;}{
\s28\qc\widctlpar\adjustright \b\cgrid \sbasedon0 \snext28 Title;}}{\*\listtable{\list\listtemplateid67698705\listsimple{\listlevel\levelnfc0\leveljc0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\'02\'00);}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fbias0 
\fi-360\li360\jclisttab\tx360 }{\listname ;}\listid1159031727}{\list\listtemplateid1714467778{\listlevel\levelnfc0\leveljc0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\'02\'00.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fbias0 \fi-720\li1080
\jclisttab\tx1080 }{\listlevel\levelnfc4\leveljc0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\'02\'01.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fbias0 \fi-360\li1440\jclisttab\tx1440 }{\listlevel\levelnfc2\leveljc2\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0
\levelindent0{\leveltext\'02\'02.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-180\li2160\jclisttab\tx2160 }{\listlevel\levelnfc0\leveljc0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\'02\'03.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-360\li2880\jclisttab\tx2880 }
{\listlevel\levelnfc4\leveljc0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\'02\'04.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-360\li3600\jclisttab\tx3600 }{\listlevel\levelnfc2\leveljc2\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext
\'02\'05.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-180\li4320\jclisttab\tx4320 }{\listlevel\levelnfc0\leveljc0\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\'02\'06.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-360\li5040\jclisttab\tx5040 }{\listlevel\levelnfc4\leveljc0
\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\'02\'07.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}\fi-360\li5760\jclisttab\tx5760 }{\listlevel\levelnfc2\leveljc2\levelfollow0\levelstartat1\levelspace0\levelindent0{\leveltext\'02\'08.;}{\levelnumbers\'01;}
\fi-180\li6480\jclisttab\tx6480 }{\listname ;}\listid1214390310}}{\*\listoverridetable{\listoverride\listid1159031727\listoverridecount0\ls1}{\listoverride\listid1214390310\listoverridecount0\ls2}}{\info{\title FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT:}
{\author Governance Office}{\operator Governance}{\creatim\yr2002\mo9\dy17\hr8\min35}{\revtim\yr2002\mo9\dy17\hr8\min35}{\printim\yr2002\mo9\dy16\hr16\min16}{\version2}{\edmins1}{\nofpages12}{\nofwords2844}{\nofchars16211}{\*\company Governance}
{\nofcharsws19908}{\vern115}}\margr1440\margb720 \widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\hyphhotz0\sprstsp\otblrul\brkfrm\sprstsm\truncex\nolead\msmcap\lytprtmet\hyphcaps0\fracwidth\viewkind4\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot \fet0\sectd 
\sbknone\linex-32767\endnhere\sectdefaultcl {\*\pnseclvl1\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang{\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang{\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang{\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4
\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl5\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang{\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang{\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang{\pntxtb (}
{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang{\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang{\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \widctlpar\adjustright \f7\cgrid {FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT:
\par \tab Sheri Layral
\par \tab 312 Signers' Hall
\par \tab 474-7964   FYSENAT
\par 
\par For Audioconferencing:  Bridge #:  1-877-751-8040    (Passcode:  512265)
\par \tab \tab \tab \tab Fairbanks:  474-8050  (Chair's Passcode:  802028)
\par 
\par }\pard \qc\widctlpar\adjustright {\b\ul A G E N D A
\par }{ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ FACULTY SENATE MEETING #110}{\b\ul 
\par }{Monday, September 23, 2002
\par 1:00 p.m. - 3:15 p.m.
\par Wood Center Carol Brown Ballroom
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {\b\ul 
\par }{1:00\tab I\tab Call to Order \endash  Godwin Chukwu      \tab \tab \tab   5 Min.
\par \tab \tab A.\tab Roll Call
\par \tab \tab B.\tab Approval of Minutes to Meeting #109
\par \tab \tab C.\tab Adoption of Agenda
\par 
\par 1:05\tab II\tab Status of Chancellor's Office Actions \tab \tab   5 Min.
\par \tab A.\tab Motions Approved:
\par \tab \tab 1.\tab Motion to approve the M.A. degree program 
\par \tab \tab \tab in Applied Linguistics.
\par \tab \tab 2.\tab Motion to approve the list of the 2001-2002 
\par \tab \tab \tab degree candidates.
\par \tab \tab 3.\tab Motion to approved "W" syllabus requirements.
\par \tab \tab 4.\tab Motion to amend the definition of Graduate 
\par \tab \tab \tab Scholastic and Academic standing.
\par \tab \tab 5.\tab Motion to amend the }{\cf1 Appeals Policy for Academic 
\par \tab \tab \tab Decisions Other Than Assignment of Grades}{.
\par \tab \tab 6.\tab Motion to amend the Grade Appeals Policy.
\par \tab \tab 7.\tab Motion to amend the ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Regulations for Emeritus 
\par \tab \tab \tab Status.
\par \tab \tab 8.\tab Motion to amend the ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Policies & Regulations for 
\par \tab \tab \tab the Appointment and Evaluation of Faculty.
\par \tab \tab 9.\tab Motion to add a "pre-major" admission status to 
\par \tab \tab \tab the baccalaureate degree.
\par \tab B.\tab Motion Denied: 
\par \tab \tab 10.\tab Motion to suspend approval of all classified 
\par \tab \tab \tab research.
\par \tab C.\tab Motions Approved by the Administrative Committee and 
\par \tab \tab the Chancellor:  
\par \tab \tab 11.\tab Motion to amend the ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Policies & Regulations for 
\par \tab \tab \tab the Appointment and Evaluation of Faculty.
\par \tab D.\tab Motions Pending:  none
\par 
\par 1:10\tab III\tab A.\tab Remarks by Chancellor M. Lind   \tab \tab 10 Min.
\par \tab \tab B.\tab Remarks by Provost P. Reichardt\tab \tab 10 Min.
\par \tab \tab \tab Summary Report of 2001/2002 Faculty Reviews
\par \tab \tab \tab (Attachment 110/1)
\par \tab \tab C.\tab Guest Speaker - Claudia Clark, Dean   \tab 10 Min.
\par \tab \tab \tab Enrollment Management
\par 
\par 1:40\tab IV\tab Governance Reports
\par \tab A}{.\tab President-Elect's Comments - P. Pinney\tab \tab   5 Min.
\par }{\tab B}{.\tab President's Report - G. Chukwu     \tab \tab \tab   5 Min.
\par }{\tab C}{.\tab Staff Council - L. Ledlow \tab \tab \tab \tab   5 Min.
\par }{\tab D.\tab ASÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ -D. Miller / GSO - \tab \tab     \tab \tab   5 Min.
\par 
\par 2:00\tab V\tab New Business\tab \tab \tab \tab \tab \tab 10 Min.
\par \tab A.\tab Motion to confirm membership on the Ad Hoc 
\par \tab \tab Committee on Unit Criteria, submitted by Administrative 
\par \tab \tab Committee (Attachment 110/2) 
\par 
\par 2:10\tab VI\tab Discussion Items   \tab \tab \tab \tab \tab   30 Min.
\par \tab A.\tab Discussion of KUAC Gubernatorial debate between 
\par \tab \tab Fran Ulmer and Frank Murkowski on October 17th.  
\par \tab B.\tab Discussion on Classified Research
\par \tab C.\tab Discussion on Recognition of Outstanding Senators
\par \tab D.\tab Discussion on Ad Hoc Committee on Academic Advising
\par 
\par 2:40\tab VII\tab Public Comments/Questions \tab \tab \tab \tab   5 Min.
\par 
\par 2:45\tab \tab ***BREAK***\tab \tab \tab \tab \tab \tab 10 Min.
\par 
\par 2:55\tab VIII\tab Committee Reports \tab \tab \tab \tab \tab 15 Min.
\par \tab A.\tab Curricular Affairs - R. Illingworth
\par \tab B.\tab Faculty Affairs - P. McRoy (Attachment 110/3)
\par \tab C.\tab Graduate Academic & Advisory Committee \endash  M. Murray
\par \tab \tab (Attachment 110/4)
\par \tab D.\tab Core Review - D. Schamel (Attachment 110/5)
\par \tab E.\tab Curriculum Review - G. Holton
\par \tab F.\tab Developmental Studies - J. Weber
\par \tab G.\tab Faculty Appeals & Oversight - 
\par \tab H.\tab Faculty Development, Assessment & Improvement \endash  
\par }\pard \fi720\li1440\widctlpar\adjustright {
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {3:10\tab IX\tab Members' Comments/Questions\tab \tab \tab   5 Min.
\par 
\par 3:15\tab X\tab Adjournment
\par 
\par }\pard \ri-260\widctlpar\adjustright {
\par **
\par ATTACHMENT 110/1
\par }{\caps ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Faculty Senate #110
\par SEPTEMBER 23, 2002
\par }{
\par 
\par }\pard\plain \s28\qc\widctlpar\adjustright \b\cgrid {\f7 SUMMARY REPORT OF 2001/2002 FACULTY REVIEWS
\par }\pard\plain \qc\widctlpar\adjustright \f7\cgrid {\b 
\par Paul Reichardt
\par 
\par 
\par }\pard\plain \s1\keepn\widctlpar\outlinelevel0\adjustright \b\fs20\cgrid {\b0\f7\fs24\ul Promotion/Mandatory Tenure and Mandatory Tenure Only
\par }\pard\plain \widctlpar\adjustright \f7\cgrid {\ul 
\par }{11 files; 11 \endash  yes; yes at all stages of review for all 11
\par 
\par }\pard\plain \s1\keepn\widctlpar\outlinelevel0\adjustright \b\fs20\cgrid {\b0\f7\fs24\ul Promotion/Early Tenure and Early Tenure Only
\par }\pard\plain \widctlpar\adjustright \f7\cgrid {\b\ul 
\par }{17 files; 13 \endash  yes; 4 \endash  withdrawn
\par 
\par Early Tenure:  yes at all stages for all 3 files
\par 
\par Promotion Early Tenure, <4 yrs:\tab 1 yes at all stages
\par \tab \tab \tab \tab 3 yes at peer and dean levels, no at campus 
\par \tab \tab \tab \tab committee and provost levels; withdrawn
\par 
\par Promotion/Early Tenure, 4 yrs: \tab 3 yes at all levels
\par \tab \tab \tab \tab 1 yes at peer and dean/director, no at campus
\par \tab \tab \tab \tab committee and provost; withdrawn*
\par 
\par Promotion/Early Tenure, 5/6 yrs:\tab 2 yes at all levels
\par \tab \tab \tab \tab 2 no only at campus committee**
\par 
\par *non-precedent setting MOU with UNAC
\par **committee vote 3-4 in both cases
\par 
\par 
\par }\pard\plain \s1\keepn\widctlpar\outlinelevel0\adjustright \b\fs20\cgrid {\b0\f7\fs24\ul Promotion
\par }\pard\plain \widctlpar\adjustright \f7\cgrid {
\par 15 files; 12 \endash  yes, 3 \endash  withdrawn
\par 
\par 10 yes at all stages of review
\par 1 yes at all stages except Provost }{{\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 183 \\f "Symbol" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f3\fs24}}}{
\par 1 yes at peer and Chancellor levels}{{\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 183 \\f "Symbol" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f3\fs24}}{\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 183 \\f "Symbol" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f3\fs24}}}{
\par 1 yes at peer and dean levels; no at campus committee and provost; withdrawn
\par 2 yes at peer level; no at dean, campus committee and provost; withdrawn
\par 
\par }{{\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 183 \\f "Symbol" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f3\fs24}}}{candidate supplied additional information before Chancellor\rquote s review
\par }{{\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 183 \\f "Symbol" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f3\fs24}}{\field{\*\fldinst SYMBOL 183 \\f "Symbol" \\s 12}{\fldrslt\f3\fs24}}}{Chancellor\rquote s decision following formal appeal process
\par 
\par 
\par }\pard\plain \s1\keepn\widctlpar\outlinelevel0\adjustright \b\fs20\cgrid {\b0\f7\fs24\ul Fourth Year Comprehensive Review
\par }\pard\plain \widctlpar\adjustright \f7\cgrid {\ul 
\par }{13 files
\par 
\par 11 "satisfactory progress" at all stages of review
\par 2 "unsatisfactory progress" at all stages of review
\par 
\par 
\par }\pard\plain \s1\keepn\widctlpar\outlinelevel0\adjustright \b\fs20\cgrid {\b0\f7\fs24\ul Post-Tenure Review
\par }\pard\plain \widctlpar\adjustright \f7\cgrid {\ul 
\par }{No files submitted (nor required)
\par 
\par 
\par A total of 43 files were reviewed in the 2001/2002 promotion/tenure process.  Promotion and/or tenure was awarded in 3
6 cases; the other 7 files were withdrawn prior to the Chancellor's review.  In 35 cases, the recommendation/ decision was "yes" at every level of review.   In only three cases was there a negative recommendation at the peer and/or dean level.  There were
 four cases in which the Provost's recommendation (3) and/or the Chancellor\rquote s decision (3) differed from the recommendation of the campus-wide committee.
\par 
\par }{\ul Observations:
\par 
\par {\listtext\pard\plain\f7 \hich\af7\dbch\af0\loch\f7 1.\tab}}\pard \fi-720\li1080\widctlpar\jclisttab\tx1080\ls2\adjustright {ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ 40% of last year\rquote s files were for \ldblquote early\rdblquote  promotion/tenure or "early" tenure.  Ab
out half (8) were from Assistant Professors applying at the beginning of their 2nd, 3rd or 4th years; half of them were successful. The rest of the applicants (all successful) were about evenly split between Assistant Professors who had received very favo
rable 4th Year Comprehensive Reviews and recently hired Associate Professors and Professors who chose not to wait until their mandatory years.
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {
\par }\pard \li1080\widctlpar\adjustright {I believe the campus-wide committee did an excellent job in reviewing this set of files and making their recommen
dations.  Of course, there is room for professional differences of opinion on individual cases; and the committee certainly took its share of shots in this respect.  However, I think the committee made a long-term contribution to ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ by fully discussing t
h
e "early tenure" situation, developing an understanding on how they would approach these cases, and then consistently apply promotion/tenure criteria to the individual cases.  I commend them for their approach to these cases, for their rigorous reviews, a
nd for their conscientious attempts to distinguish between early tenure candidates who have met the tenure criteria and those who are simply making good progress toward tenure.
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {
\par {\listtext\pard\plain\f7 \hich\af7\dbch\af0\loch\f7 2.\tab}}\pard \fi-720\li1080\widctlpar\jclisttab\tx1080\ls2\adjustright {Clearly the most difficult question in the early tenure cases is, "How does ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ
 count my previous experience?"  While I doubt if the faculty can come up with a clear, consensus-based answer (and also question whether there is a simple, universal answer), I do think it  is a question that is worthy of faculty discussion.
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {
\par {\listtext\pard\plain\f7 \hich\af7\dbch\af0\loch\f7 3.\tab}}\pard \fi-720\li1080\widctlpar\jclisttab\tx1080\ls2\adjustright {In my view t
he most problematic part of our promotion/tenure process is the general lack of appropriate unit criteria at the department/ school/college level.  In the absence of such criteria, committees and administrators must rely on ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ criteria.  In practice, rev
iewers (especially faculty committees) find this to be difficult; and disappointed candidates often find rationales based on the ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ criteria to be vague and hard to understand.
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {
\par {\listtext\pard\plain\f7 \hich\af7\dbch\af0\loch\f7 4.\tab}}\pard \fi-720\li1080\widctlpar\jclisttab\tx1080\ls2\adjustright {Reviewers of files (both administrators and members of faculty committees) should be reminded of a few details:
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {
\par {\listtext\pard\plain\f7 \hich\af7\dbch\af0\loch\f7 a.\tab}}\pard \fi-360\li1440\widctlpar\jclisttab\tx1440\ls2\ilvl1\adjustright {
Any "promises" made by deans, directors or department chairs at time of hire should be addressed by both the candidate (in her/his file) and by reviewers (especially by deans, directors, department chairs).
\par {\listtext\pard\plain\f7 \hich\af7\dbch\af0\loch\f7 b.\tab}The applicable ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Faculty Policies and Regulations for the FY03 process are the 2002 version for faculty represented by UNAC and the 1997 version for faculty represented by ACCFT.
\par {\listtext\pard\plain\f7 \hich\af7\dbch\af0\loch\f7 c.\tab}Peer committees need clear written rules on size, identities of individual members, eligibility for membership, and procedures.  Then they need to strictly follow their rules.
\par {\listtext\pard\plain\f7 \hich\af7\dbch\af0\loch\f7 d.\tab}Unit level peer committees have the responsibility to carry out and report an "in depth" analysis of each candidate's performance.  Analysis, not data summary, should be
 their focus. Examples might be: analysis of IAS results to determine why "Dr. Smith" is a good teacher rather than statistical analysis of "average IAS score" for entry number three; analysis of multiple authorship and significance of "Dr. Smith's" key p
ublications rather than simply reporting the number of peer-reviewed articles that Smith has published.
\par {\listtext\pard\plain\f7 \hich\af7\dbch\af0\loch\f7 e.\tab}Unit Criteria supplement, but do not replace, ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ criteria
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {
\par {\listtext\pard\plain\f7 \hich\af7\dbch\af0\loch\f7 5.\tab}}\pard \fi-720\li1080\widctlpar\jclisttab\tx1080\ls2\adjustright {Deans should describe the process used to select the two external reviewers designated by the
 dean.  All reviewers of the file need to know if these two individuals were suggested by the candidate or chosen by another method.
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {
\par }\pard \fi-660\li1020\widctlpar\adjustright {6.\tab The Faculty Senate should put in place a process for reminding units when their unit criteria need reaffirmation or change (See ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Faculty Senate Regulation III.E).
\par 
\par }\pard \ri-260\widctlpar\adjustright {
\par *
\par ATTACHMENT 110/2
\par }{\caps ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Faculty Senate #110
\par SEPTEMBER 23, 2002
\par }{SUBMITTED BY ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE}{\caps 
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {
\par 
\par MOTION:
\par ======
\par 
\par The ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Faculty Senate moves to confirm the membership on the Ad Hoc Committee on Unit Criteria consisting of one member from each of the following committees:  Curricular Affairs;
 Faculty Affairs; Faculty Development, Assessment, and Improvement; and Faculty Appeals & Oversight Committee.
\par 
\par \tab EFFECTIVE:  \tab Immediately
\par 
\par 
\par \tab \tab \tab \tab 
\par 
\par AD HOC COMMITTEE ON UNIT CRITERIA
\par 
\par Curricular Affairs - Gary Holton
\par Faculty Affairs - Dan Odess
\par Faculty Development, Assessment & Improvement - Abel Bult-Ito
\par Faculty Appeals & Oversight - Julie Riley
\par 
\par 
\par }\pard \ri-260\widctlpar\adjustright {*
\par }{ATTACHMENT 110/3
\par }{\caps ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Faculty Senate #110
\par SEPTEMBER 23, 2002
\par }{SUBMITTED BY FACULTY AFFAIRS
\par 
\par 
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {FACULTY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE 
\par 
\par Report of Meeting
\par Monday, 9 Sep 2002/ 3PM
\par Runcorn Conference Room
\par 
\par 
\par }{\b Committee Members Present:  }{Mark Box, CLA; Abel Bult-Ito, CSEM; Joan Leguard, CLA; Bret Luick, CRA; Jennifer McBeath, SALARM; Peter McRoy, SFOS; Dan Odess, CLA; Shirish Patil, SME; Bret Simmons, SOM
\par }\pard \li720\widctlpar\adjustright {
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {Meetings for fall semester for Faculty Affairs:  second Monday of the month, 3:00 PM, Runcorn Conference Room, 300 NSF.
\par 
\par As a first order of business the committee affirmed the election of McRoy as chair and elected Abel Bult-Ito as co-chair.
\par 
\par 
\par }{\b Old Business from last semester: 
\par }{The following items from last semester remain on the Faculty Affairs agenda. The FA Committee discussed the items and reviewed their status.
\par 
\par 1. Classified Research 
\par }\pard \fi720\widctlpar\adjustright {
The motion on this policy prepared by Faculty Affairs Committee last semester was defeated on the floor of the Senate.  In response Senate President Chukwu appointed a new committee to prepare a policy statement. When ready, the motion from the ad ho
c committee will be sent to the Senate through Faculty Affairs. J. Leguard suggested that UNAC should be consulted for their views on Classified Research. P. McRoy will notify Pete Pinney (chair of the new committee) about UNAC concerns.
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {
\par 2. Senate organization: Bylaw revision
\par }\pard\plain \s27\fi720\widctlpar\adjustright \f4\cgrid {\f7 
The purpose of this is to revise the order of business for Senate and Administrative committee meetings. P. McRoy proposed this item last year to increase the dialogue in Senate meetings and to permit introduction of new business from
 the floor. Such actions occurred in the last meeting of the Senate last semester so it is possible that no revision is needed. The Administration Committee should clarify the order and procedures for Senate business.
\par }\pard\plain \widctlpar\adjustright \f7\cgrid {
\par 3. Parking: status and function of the advisory committee
\par }\pard\plain \s27\widctlpar\tx720\tx1440\tx2250\adjustright \f4\cgrid {\f7 \tab 
The committee discussed problems and possible revisions to the existing parking committee.  The perceived need is for a motion to reestablish the Parking Advisory Committee as a committee of the ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Governance Coordinating Committee S
. Patil and P. McRoy will do some investigation of current practices by the existing committee.
\par }\pard\plain \widctlpar\adjustright \f7\cgrid {
\par 4. Regulation on Research Misconduct
\par \tab A draft policy was prepared by N. Swazo and L. Duffy last year and sent to the University\rquote  counsel\rquote s office for review where it has apparently died. If resurrected, the policy will be sent to the Senate through Faculty Affairs.
\par 
\par 5.  ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Budget process
\par }\pard \fi720\widctlpar\adjustright {The FA committee will make the formulation of a procedure to involve the Senate in budget development an on-going business item. B. Simmons will take on this task for the committee.
\par }\pard \li360\widctlpar\adjustright {
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {6. Spouse Appointment Policy
\par }\pard \fi720\widctlpar\adjustright {ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ needs a policy for a trailing spouse. B. Luick and A. Bult-Ito will examine the issue and develop a draft policy for the committee.
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {
\par 
\par }{\b New Business:
\par }{1.  Bookstore policy on textbook substitution.
\par }\pard \fi720\widctlpar\adjustright {
M. Box raised an issue concerning texts ordering procedures by the bookstore. Apparently in some cases texts ordered by faculty members were substituted by the bookstore without consultation with the instructor. M. Box and J. 
Leguard will investigate procedure/policy for the committee to formulate a course of action for the Senate.
\par 
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {2. News Miner/ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ gubernatorial debate 
\par }\pard \fi720\widctlpar\adjustright {B. Luick informed the committee of the pending gubernatorial debate to be held on campus and hosted by KUAC
 and the News Miner. Some faculty members have objected to the procedures involved in the structure of the debate and screening of the audience by the newspaper. B. Luick and M. Box will seek clarification from KUAC to ensure that University principles ar
e upheld.
\par }\pard \li1080\widctlpar\adjustright {
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {3.  D. Odess was appointed to be the FA representative to the Unit Criteria Committee.
\par 
\par Adjourn: 4:09 p.m.
\par }\pard \ri-260\widctlpar\adjustright {
\par 
\par }{*
\par }{ATTACHMENT 110/4
\par }{\caps ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Faculty Senate #110
\par SEPTEMBER 23, 2002
\par }{SUBMITTED BY GRADUATE ACADEMIC & ADVISORY 
\par 
\par 
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {GRADUATE ACADEMIC AND ADVISORY COMMITTEE
\par 
\par REPORT OF MEETING, Wednesday September 11 2002 1:30 p.m.
\par 
\par COMMITTEE MEMBERS PRESENT:  Abhijit Dandekar, Petroleum Engineering; Mary Erhlander, CLA; Rolf Gradinger, SFOS/IMS; Meriam Karlsson, Plant/Animal/Soil Sci.; Zhonggo Ma, Civil and Environme
ntal Engineering; Pamela McWherter, Communications; Christa Mulder, Biology and Wildlife/IAB; Maribeth Murray, Anthropology; Doug Reynolds, Economics; Dennis Stephens, Library
\par 
\par Meetings for fall semester:  Fridays, 3:30 p.m. Chancellor's Conference Room, 330 Signers' Hall. 
\par 
\par As a first order of business the committee appointed Maribeth Murray chair.
\par  
\par }{\b Old Business from last semester:
\par 
\par }{The following items from last semester remain on the GAAC agenda and were briefly introduced to new GAAC members for discussion in future meetings.
\par 
\par {\pntext\pard\plain\f7 \hich\af7\dbch\af0\loch\f7 1)\tab}}\pard \fi-360\li360\widctlpar\jclisttab\tx360{\*\pn \pnlvlbody\ilvl0\ls1\pnrnot0\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent360\pnhang{\pntxta )}}\ls1\adjustright {
Follow-up on issues raised at course/program introduction during later evaluations.
\par }\pard \widctlpar{\*\pn \pnlvlcont\ilvl0\ls0\pnrnot0\pndec }\adjustright {
\par Should the GAAC provide a list of potential concerns raised during course/program introductions to later evaluators from the GAAC and to other cou
rse/program reviewers? This is issue is one of a number raised last semester that relate to continuity in GAAC decision and policy making.
\par 
\par {\pntext\pard\plain\f7 \hich\af7\dbch\af0\loch\f7 2)\tab}}\pard \fi-360\li360\widctlpar\jclisttab\tx360{\*\pn \pnlvlbody\ilvl0\ls1\pnrnot0\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent360\pnhang{\pntxta )}}\ls1\adjustright {Distance Delivery
\par }\pard \widctlpar{\*\pn \pnlvlcont\ilvl0\ls0\pnrnot0\pndec }\adjustright {
\par Considering the rapid development of on-line graduate courses, including the development of degre
es that are offered on-line the GAAC saw the need to implement some quality control into the process.  On-line courses currently do not require a submission of a formal request, nor do student course evaluations appear to take into account the specific st
rengths and weaknesses of on-line delivery.  These issues should be followed up in the coming semesters and along with inquiry to Curricular Affairs regarding efforts there to implement a joint CAC-GAAC working group on "Technology Enhanced Education."

\par 
\par {\pntext\pard\plain\f7 \hich\af7\dbch\af0\loch\f7 3)\tab}}\pard \fi-360\li360\widctlpar\jclisttab\tx360{\*\pn \pnlvlbody\ilvl0\ls1\pnrnot0\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent360\pnhang{\pntxta )}}\ls1\adjustright {Joi
nt Ph.D. / Collaborative Ph.D. within the UA System
\par }\pard \widctlpar{\*\pn \pnlvlcont\ilvl0\ls0\pnrnot0\pndec }\adjustright {
\par What role if any should the GAAC play in the development of policies related to Joint/Collaborative Ph.D. degrees within the UA system?   This follows from some of the business addressed by the GAAC last
 year which, although not directly related to the Joint/Collaborative Ph.D., relates to the complexities and challenges associated with the development of new graduate degree programs even within ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ.
\par 
\par {\pntext\pard\plain\f7 \hich\af7\dbch\af0\loch\f7 4)\tab}}\pard \fi-360\li360\widctlpar\jclisttab\tx360{\*\pn \pnlvlbody\ilvl0\ls1\pnrnot0\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent360\pnhang{\pntxta )}}\ls1\adjustright {Stacked Courses
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {
\par There are many issues surrounding the
 stacking of 400/600 level courses.  There is currently no mechanism in place to check the balance other than at the course approval stage, there is no evaluation of the extent to which degree programs rely on stacked courses nor any consensus on what pro
p
ortion of stacked courses is appropriate for a degree, it is not clear whether graduate students can enroll at the undergraduate level and visa versa, nor is there recognition in faculty workload of the extra effort required to prepare and teach stacked c
ourses.  In the last meeting of GAAC for Spring 2002, the committee considered forwarding a discussion item to the Senate on limiting the number of stacked courses than are part of a degree program\rquote 
s required courses or courses counting towards a degree.  Committee members M. Murray and C. Read were asked to develop a draft policy on stacking and to identify and enumerate problems associated with stacking.  M. Murray proposed to circulate this }{
\ul very rough}{ draft to the new GAAC in order to get the discussion on this issue moving forward.
\par 
\par }\pard\plain \s1\keepn\widctlpar\outlinelevel0\adjustright \b\fs20\cgrid {\f7\fs24 New Business:
\par }\pard\plain \widctlpar\adjustright \f7\cgrid {\b 
\par }{1) Overloads in Three Week Summer Sessions
\par  
\par The committee has been asked to address the issue of policy development for "maximum credits" for summer semester.  This issue is also under advisement at Curricular 
Affairs.  It appears that there was once a policy but that it has somehow disappeared from the catalogue.  This item was placed on the agenda for discussion on September 20.
\par }{\b 
\par }{Meeting Adjourned: somewhere around 2:30 p.m}{\b .
\par 
\par }\pard \ri-260\widctlpar\adjustright {
\par }{*
\par }{ATTACHMENT 110/5
\par }{\caps ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Faculty Senate #110
\par SEPTEMBER 23, 2002
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {SUBMITTED BY CORE REVIEW
\par 
\par 
\par Core Review Committee Report
\par 
\par Meeting of 11 September, 2002, 1-2 pm
\par 
\par Present:  Douglas Schamel (Chair), Jin Brown, Mary Goodwin, Paul McCarthy, Rainer Newberry, John Heaton, Sue McHenry (ex-officio), Frank Williams (guest)
\par 
\par Absent: D.A. Bartlett, Jill Faudree (both had courses to teach), student member (vacant)
\par 
\par Frank Williams presented ideas regarding the potential addition of a "technology" course to the Core requirements.  We discussed the pros and c
ons of this idea for about 30 minutes, then asked for several members to examine the desirability and feasibility of implementing such a course or courses.  Volunteers for this sub-committee included Jin Brown, Mary Goodwin, Paul McCarthy; Frank Williams 
a
greed to work with this committee.  Ideas discussed included 1) adding material (and one credit) to the LS 101X course, and 2) imbedding technology into upper-division courses (as currently done with "O" and "W" courses).  Committee members recognized tha
t some degree programs are tight for credits.
\par 
\par Schamel (in his role as Chair) debriefed members on Core activity over the summer.  This included a number of petitions, the receipt of assessments of Core courses, and the current attempt to "tidy up" loose en
ds with syllabus and catalog descriptions of "O" and "W" courses.  To this end, syllabi of "O" and "W" courses offered this fall will be collected and examined for appropriate wording.  This will be done by deans and directors before passing syllabi to th
e Core Review Committee.  Courses with syllabi lacking essential details will be removed from the Core beginning with the 2003-04 academic year.
\par 
\par The desirability of allowing Core courses to be counted as part of major or minor requirements was brought forw
ard last academic year.  This is clearly NOT allowed with current wording of the Core document.  The Core Review Committee will investigate this matter this academic year.  Rainer Newberry and John Heaton have currently volunteered to investigate this iss
ue; they will consult with Gayle Gregory (Graduation Office).
\par 
\par Jin Brown moved that Douglas Schamel continue as committee chair.  This was seconded; all members present voted "yes".  Schamel agreed to continue as Chair.
\par 
\par The next meeting will be Wednesday, 16 October, 9:15 \endash  10:15.  The meeting room will be announced later.
\par 
\par 
\par }}