{\rtf1\mac\ansicpg10000\uc1 \deff0\deflang1033\deflangfe1033{\upr{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset256\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}{\f4\fnil\fcharset256\fprq2{\*\panose 02000500000000000000}Times;}
{\f7\fnil\fcharset256\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0503030404040204}Geneva;}{\f12\fnil\fcharset256\fprq2{\*\panose 02020502060305060204}New York;}}{\*\ud{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fcharset256\fprq2{\*\panose 02020603050405020304}Times New Roman;}
{\f4\fnil\fcharset256\fprq2{\*\panose 02000500000000000000}Times;}{\f7\fnil\fcharset256\fprq2{\*\panose 020b0503030404040204}Geneva;}{\f12\fnil\fcharset256\fprq2{\*\panose 02020502060305060204}New York;}}}}{\colortbl;\red0\green0\blue0;
\red0\green0\blue255;\red0\green255\blue255;\red0\green255\blue0;\red255\green0\blue255;\red255\green0\blue0;\red255\green255\blue0;\red255\green255\blue255;\red0\green0\blue128;\red0\green128\blue128;\red0\green128\blue0;\red128\green0\blue128;
\red128\green0\blue0;\red128\green128\blue0;\red128\green128\blue128;\red192\green192\blue192;}{\stylesheet{\widctlpar\adjustright \f7\cgrid \snext0 Normal;}{\s1\keepn\widctlpar\adjustright \b\fs20\ul\cgrid \sbasedon0 \snext0 heading 1;}{
\s2\keepn\widctlpar\adjustright \cgrid \sbasedon0 \snext0 heading 2;}{\*\cs10 \additive Default Paragraph Font;}{\s15\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\adjustright \f7\cgrid \sbasedon0 \snext15 footer;}{\s16\widctlpar\tqc\tx4320\tqr\tx8640\adjustright 
\f7\cgrid \sbasedon0 \snext16 header;}{\*\cs17 \additive \sbasedon10 page number;}{\s18\widctlpar\adjustright \f12\cgrid \sbasedon0 \snext18 sp3;}{\s19\qc\sl480\slmult0\widctlpar\adjustright \b\f4\fs28\cgrid \sbasedon0 \snext19 Headings;}{
\s20\qj\fi360\sl480\slmult0\widctlpar\adjustright \f4\fs28\cgrid \sbasedon0 \snext20 Paragraph;}{\s21\fi-1800\li1800\ri-540\widctlpar\tx720\tx1340\tx1800\tx8900\adjustright \f7\cgrid \sbasedon0 \snext21 agenda;}{\s22\li900\ri-720\widctlpar
\tx3860\adjustright \f4\cgrid \sbasedon0 \snext22 CINDY;}{\s23\ri-900\widctlpar\tx6840\tx7280\tx8460\tx9080\tx9440\tx10520\adjustright \b\f7\fs20\ul\cgrid \sbasedon0 \snext23 index;}{\s24\widctlpar\adjustright \f12\fs20\cgrid \sbasedon0 \snext24 
page number2;}{\s25\fi-720\li720\ri-720\widctlpar\tx540\tx720\tx7100\tx7740\tx8460\tx9260\tx10620\adjustright \f7\fs20\cgrid \sbasedon23 \snext25 index2;}{\s26\ri-900\widctlpar\tx7020\tx8460\tx9080\tx9440\tx10520\adjustright \b\f7\fs20\cgrid 
\sbasedon0 \snext26 index heading;}{\*\cs27 \additive \ul\cf2 \sbasedon10 Hyperlink;}{\s28\li720\widctlpar\adjustright \loch\af4\hich\af4\dbch\f4\cgrid \sbasedon0 \snext28 Body Text Indent 3;}{\s29\fi-1440\li1440\widctlpar\adjustright \cgrid 
\sbasedon0 \snext29 Body Text 2;}}{\info{\title FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT:}{\author Governance Office}{\operator Governance}{\creatim\yr2003\mo9\dy16\hr11\min7}{\revtim\yr2003\mo9\dy16\hr11\min7}{\printim\yr2003\mo9\dy16\hr10\min47}{\version2}
{\edmins0}{\nofpages21}{\nofwords4294}{\nofchars24476}{\*\company Governance}{\nofcharsws30058}{\vern115}}\margl1440\margr1440\margb720 
\widowctrl\ftnbj\aenddoc\hyphhotz0\sprstsp\otblrul\brkfrm\sprstsm\truncex\nolead\msmcap\lytprtmet\hyphcaps0\fracwidth\viewkind4\viewscale100\pgbrdrhead\pgbrdrfoot \fet0\sectd \sbknone\linex0\endnhere\sectdefaultcl {\*\pnseclvl1
\pnucrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang{\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl2\pnucltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang{\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl3\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang{\pntxta .}}{\*\pnseclvl4\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl5
\pndec\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang{\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl6\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang{\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl7\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang{\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl8\pnlcltr\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang
{\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}{\*\pnseclvl9\pnlcrm\pnstart1\pnindent720\pnhang{\pntxtb (}{\pntxta )}}\pard\plain \widctlpar\adjustright \f7\cgrid {FOR MORE INFORMATION, CONTACT:
\par \tab Sheri Layral
\par \tab 312 Signers' Hall
\par \tab 474-7964   FYSENAT
\par 
\par For Audioconferencing:  Bridge #:  1-877-751-8040    (Passcode:  512265)
\par \tab \tab \tab \tab Fairbanks:  474-8050  (Chair's Passcode:  802028)
\par 
\par 
\par }\pard \qc\widctlpar\adjustright {\b\ul A G E N D A
\par }{ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ FACULTY SENATE MEETING #117}{\b\ul 
\par }{Monday, September 22, 2003
\par 1:00 p.m. - 3:00 p.m.
\par Wood Center Carol Brown Ballroom
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {\b\ul 
\par 
\par }{1:00\tab I\tab Call to Order \endash  Pete Pinney       \tab \tab \tab   5 Min.
\par \tab \tab A.\tab Roll Call
\par \tab \tab B.\tab Approval of Minutes to Meeting #115 & #116
\par \tab \tab C.\tab Adoption of Agenda
\par 
\par 1:05\tab II\tab Status of Chancellor's Office Actions \tab \tab   5 Min.
\par \tab \tab A.\tab Motions Approved:
\par \tab \tab \tab 1.\tab Motion to approve the Unit Criteria for the 
\par \tab \tab \tab \tab School of Management.
\par \tab \tab \tab 2.\tab Motion to amend the Reserving Courses for 
\par \tab \tab \tab \tab Graduate Programs policy.
\par \tab \tab \tab 3.\tab Motion to delete the Emergency Services 
\par \tab \tab \tab \tab (formerly Fire Science) Certificate. 
\par \tab \tab \tab 4.\tab Motion on mandatory placement policy.
\par \tab \tab \tab 5.\tab Motion to approve a statement with the 
\par \tab \tab \tab \tab IAS Student Evaluation package.
\par \tab B.\tab Motion Denied: 
\par \tab \tab 1.\tab Motion to approve a ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Policy on Classified and 
\par \tab \tab \tab Proprietary Research.
\par 
\par 1:1}{0 \tab }{III}{\tab Public Comments/Questions \tab \tab \tab \tab   5 Min.}{
\par }{
\par }{1:1}{5\tab }{I}{V\tab Governance Reports
\par \tab A.\tab President's Comments - Pete Pinney  \tab \tab   5 Min. 
\par \tab B.\tab President-elect's Report - Abel Bult-Ito    \tab \tab   5 Min.
\par \tab C.\tab Staff Council - Rory O'Neill  \tab \tab \tab \tab   5 Min.
\par \tab D.\tab ASÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ -Thom Walker / GSO -   \tab     \tab \tab   5 Min.
\par \tab E.\tab Faculty Liaison - Eva Kopacz \tab \tab \tab \tab   5 Min. 
\par 
\par }{1:40\tab V\tab A.\tab Remarks by Chancellor M. Lind   \tab \tab 10 Min.
\par \tab \tab B.\tab Remarks by Provost P. Reichardt\tab \tab 10 Min.
\par \tab \tab \tab Summary Report of 2002/2003 Faculty Reviews
\par \tab \tab \tab (Attachment 117/1)
\par 
\par \tab VI\tab Consent Agenda
\par }{\tab A.\tab Motion to confirm membership on the Ad Hoc 
\par \tab \tab Committee on Unit Criteria (Attachment 117/2), 
\par \tab \tab submitted by Administrative Committee
\par }{
\par 2:00\tab VII\tab New Business\tab \tab \tab \tab \tab \tab 10 Min.
\par \tab A.\tab Motion to amend the Academic Bankruptcy policy 
\par \tab \tab (Attachment 117/3), submitted by Curricular Affairs
\par \tab B.\tab Motion to establish a Faculty Travel Committee 
\par \tab \tab (Attachment 117/4), submitted by Faculty 
\par \tab \tab Development, Assessment, & Improvement
\par 
\par 2:10\tab \tab ***BREAK***\tab \tab \tab \tab \tab \tab 10 Min
\par 
\par 2:20\tab VIII\tab Committee Reports \tab \tab \tab \tab \tab 15 Min.
\par \tab A.\tab Curricular Affairs - R. Newberry (Attachment 117/5)
\par \tab B.\tab Faculty Affairs - P. McRoy (Attachment 117/6)
\par \tab C.\tab Graduate Academic & Advisory Committee \endash  C. Mulder
\par \tab \tab (Attachment 117/7)
\par \tab D.\tab Core Review - D. Schamel
\par \tab E.\tab Curriculum Review - W. Schneider
\par \tab F.\tab Developmental Studies - J. Weber
\par \tab G.\tab Faculty Appeals & Oversight - P. Layer  (Attachment 117/8 
\par \tab \tab & Attachment 117/9))
\par \tab H.\tab Faculty Development, Assessment & Improvement \endash  
\par \tab \tab P. McCarthy (Attachment 117/10)
\par 
\par 2:35\tab IX\tab Discussion Items   \tab \tab \tab \tab \tab 15 Min.
\par \tab A.\tab Outcomes Based Budgeting
\par \tab \tab Guest Speaker - Paul Jenny, Associate Director, SW Budget & IR
\par \tab \tab (References: 
\par \tab \tab http://www.alaska.edu/swbudget/process/budgetprocess.html
\par \tab \tab http://www.alaska.edu/bor/2009Plan/2009.html
\par \tab \tab http://www.uaf.edu/chancellor/summit/)
\par 
\par 2:50\tab X\tab Members' Comments/Questions\tab \tab \tab   5 Min.
\par 
\par 3:00\tab XI\tab Adjournment
\par 
\par 
\par }\pard \ri-260\widctlpar\adjustright {\page ATTACHMENT 117/1
\par }{\caps ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Faculty Senate #117
\par September 22, 2003
\par }{
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {
\par }\pard \qc\widctlpar\adjustright {\b SUMMARY REPORT OF 2002/2003 FACULTY REVIEWS
\par 
\par Paul Reichardt
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {
\par 
\par }\pard\plain \s1\keepn\widctlpar\outlinelevel0\adjustright \b\fs20\ul\cgrid {\f7\fs24 Promotion/Mandatory Tenure and Mandatory Tenure Only
\par }\pard\plain \widctlpar\adjustright \f7\cgrid {
\par 6 files:  6 yes\tab 
\par \tab yes at all stages of review for 4 files
\par \tab no at unit peer level, yes at all subsequent levels for one file 
\par \tab yes only at Chancellor\rquote s level for one file*
\par \tab *additional information added to file in response to Provost\rquote s recommendation
\par 
\par }\pard \ri720\widctlpar\adjustright {
\par }\pard\plain \s1\ri720\keepn\widctlpar\outlinelevel0\adjustright \b\fs20\ul\cgrid {\f7\fs24 Promotion/Early Tenure and Early Tenure Only
\par }\pard\plain \ri720\widctlpar\adjustright \f7\cgrid {
\par 18 files: 17 yes, one withdrawn
\par \tab 16 yes at all stages of review
\par \tab 1 no at campuswide committee level, yes at all other levels*
\par \tab *  additional information added to file in response to campuswide committee\rquote s recommendation
\par \tab \tab }{\ul years before mandatory review\tab # files
\par }{\tab \tab \tab 1\tab \tab \tab 6
\par \tab \tab \tab 2\tab \tab \tab 6
\par \tab \tab \tab 3\tab \tab \tab 3
\par \tab \tab \tab 4\tab \tab \tab 3
\par 
\par 
\par }\pard\plain \s1\ri720\keepn\widctlpar\outlinelevel0\adjustright \b\fs20\ul\cgrid {\f7\fs24 Promotion
\par }\pard\plain \ri720\widctlpar\adjustright \f7\cgrid {
\par 11 files:  9 yes,  2 no
\par   \tab yes at all stages of review for 6 files
\par \tab yes except campuswide committee for 2 files
\par \tab tie at unit level, no at campuswide level, yes at Provost and Chancellor level for 1 file
\par \tab no at all stages of review except unit peer for 2 files
\par 
\par 
\par }{\b\ul Fourth Year Comprehensive Review (UNAC-represented faculty only)
\par }{
\par 15 files
\par \tab 11 satisfactory progress at all stages of review
\par \tab 1 unsatisfactory progress at all stages of review
\par \tab 3 satisfactory progress at 3 of the 4 stages of review
\par 
\par 
\par }\pard\plain \s1\ri720\keepn\widctlpar\outlinelevel0\adjustright \b\fs20\ul\cgrid {\f7\fs24 Post-Tenure Review
\par }\pard\plain \ri720\widctlpar\adjustright \f7\cgrid {
\par No files submitted (nor required)
\par 
\par 
\par }\pard\plain \s1\ri720\keepn\widctlpar\outlinelevel0\adjustright \b\fs20\ul\cgrid {\f7\fs24 Summary
\par }\pard\plain \ri720\widctlpar\adjustright \f7\cgrid {
\par 
\par Files submitted by 34 faculty (29 represented by UNAC, 5 represent by ACCFT) and one administrator were reviewed in the promotion/tenure process.  Promotion and/or tenure was awarded in 32 cases.  Two promotion
 applications were declined, and one promotion/early tenure application was withdrawn.  In 26 of the 35 cases, the file received a positive recommendation/decision at all levels.
\par 
\par 
\par }{\b\ul Observations:
\par }{
\par }\pard \fi-540\li720\ri720\widctlpar\adjustright {a.\tab "Early" applications for promotion to Associate Professor
 and tenure continue to greatly outnumber applications during the mandatory year.  However, the majority of these applications were submitted just one or two years prior to the year of mandatory review.  These candidates were either Assistant Professors w
h
o had previously gone through Fourth Year Comprehensive Review or were Professors who applied immediately after hire.  It appears that the recommendations of the last year or two by the campuswide committee and the Provost have had an effect in that the n
umber of "very early" tenure cases has declined, and virtually all of the early tenure candidates in 02/03 received unanimous (or nearly unanimous) support at all levels.
\par b.\tab Lack of appropriate unit criteria continues to be the most problematic part of our 
promotion/tenure process.  In the absence of such criteria, committees and administrators must rely on ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ criteria.  In practice, reviewers find this to be difficult; and disappointed candidates often find rationales based on the ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ criteria to be vague
 and hard to understand.
\par c.\tab Last year's campuswide committees did excellent jobs.  Neither I nor the Chancellor agreed with all their recommendations.  However, I believe that my practice (instituted several years ago) of discussing with the campuswide comm
ittee their recommendations in "difficult" cases has led to a better process and, hopefully, better decisions.
\par d.\tab There are some misunderstandings about the workloads of non-tenure track faculty (e.g., the perception that a research faculty member\rquote s teachi
ng record cannot be evaluated as part of his/her case for promotion).  All reviewers of files should be familiar with the relevant ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ policies and regulations (which charge deans and directors with determining which criteria apply to each of these facult
y).
\par e.\tab It is gratifying to see the beneficial effects of our Faculty Development program acknowledged and described in faculty files, especially those from faculty undergoing Fourth Year Comprehensive Review.
\par f.\tab The attached memo to deans and directors is my attempt to address some problems and issues that have arisen over the past couple years.
\par }\pard \ri720\widctlpar\adjustright {
\par 
\par --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
\par 
\par September 4, 2003
\par 
\par }\pard\plain \s2\ri720\keepn\widctlpar\outlinelevel1\adjustright \cgrid {\f7 TO:\tab \tab Deans and Directors
\par }\pard\plain \ri720\widctlpar\adjustright \f7\cgrid {
\par FROM:\tab Paul Reichardt
\par \tab \tab Provost
\par 
\par SUBJECT:\tab Some Things to Address in This Year's Promotion/Tenure Reviews
\par 
\par The following list summarizes my thoughts about ways in which we can improve on the promotion/tenure processes of the recent past.  Please share this memo with your faculty, especially department chairs and chairs of your unit peer committees.
\par 
\par 1.\tab Any "promises" made by deans, directors or department chairs at time of hire should be addressed by both the candidate (in his/her file) and by reviewers (especially deans, directors, department chairs).
\par 2.\tab The applicable ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Faculty Policies and Regulations for the FY04 process are the 2002 version for faculty represented by UNAC and the 1997 version for faculty represented by ACCFT.
\par 3.\tab Peer committees need clear written statements on size, identities of individual members, eligibility for membership, and procedures.  Then they need to strictly follow their rules.
\par 4.\tab Unit level peer committees have the responsibility to carry out and report on an in-depth analysis of each candidate's performance.  }{\ul Analysis}{
, not data summary, should be their focus.  Examples might be:  analysis of IAS results to determine why "Dr. Smith" is a good teacher rather than statistical analysis of "average IAS score for entry number three"; analysis of multiple authorship 
and significance of "Dr. Smith's" key publications rather than simply reporting the number of peer-reviewed articles that Smith has published.
\par 5.\tab Unit criteria supplement, but do not replace, ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ criteria.  Recommendations should be based upon explicitly cited criteria.
\par 6.\tab Deans and directors should describe the process used to select the two external reviewers designated by the dean or director.  All reviewers of the file need to know if these two individuals were suggested by the candidate or chosen by an
other method.
\par 7.\tab Units with their own unit criteria should ensure that they are current (see ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Faculty Senate Regulation III.E at }{\field\flddirty{\*\fldinst { HYPERLINK "http://www.uaf.edu/provost/UnitPeerCriteria/UnitPeerCriteria.html" }{{\*\datafield 
00d0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b02000000170000004200000068007400740070003a002f002f007700770077002e007500610066002e006500640075002f00700072006f0076006f00730074002f0055006e00690074005000650065007200430072006900740065007200690061002f0055006e00690074005000
650065007200430072006900740065007200690061002e00680074006d006c000000e0c9ea79f9bace118c8200aa004ba90b8400000068007400740070003a002f002f007700770077002e007500610066002e006500640075002f00700072006f0076006f00730074002f0055006e00690074005000650065007200430072
006900740065007200690061002f0055006e00690074005000650065007200430072006900740065007200690061002e00680074006d006c000000}}}{\fldrslt {\cs27\ul\cf2 http://www.uaf.edu/provost/UnitPeerCriteria/UnitPeerCriteria.html}}}{
 before using them.  Units with unit criteria that need reaffirmation should start the Senate process for obtaining reaffirmation.
\par 8.\tab Peer committees should carefully consider the recommendations written for faculty undergoing Fourt
h Year Comprehensive Review.  Highly supportive letters from peer committees to these candidates almost certainly elicit promotion/tenure applications from those individuals in the following year.  This isn't necessarily a bad thing, but committees need t
o be aware of the phenomenon as they determine the tone of the letter to a junior faculty member who is doing well.
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {
\par }\pard \ri-260\widctlpar\adjustright {
\par \page ATTACHMENT 117/2
\par }{\caps ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Faculty Senate #117
\par september 22, 2003
\par }{SUBMITTED BY ADMINISTRATIVE COMMITTEE
\par 
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {
\par MOTION:
\par ======
\par }\pard \ri720\widctlpar\adjustright {
\par The ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Faculty Senate moves to confirm the membership on the Ad Hoc Committee on Unit Criteria c
onsisting of one member from each of the following committees:  Curricular Affairs; Faculty Affairs; Faculty Development, Assessment, and Improvement; and Faculty Appeals & Oversight Committee.
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {
\par 
\par \tab EFFECTIVE:  \tab Immediately
\par 
\par 
\par \tab \tab \tab \tab 
\par 
\par AD HOC COMMITTEE ON UNIT CRITERIA
\par 
\par Curricular Affairs - Jeannette Smith
\par Faculty Affairs - Dan Odess 
\par Faculty Development, Assessment & Improvement - Shunpu Zhang
\par Faculty Appeals & Oversight - Julie Riley
\par 
\par 
\par 
\par }\pard \ri-260\widctlpar\adjustright {\page ATTACHMENT 117/3
\par }{\caps ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Faculty Senate #117
\par September 22, 2003
\par }{SUBMITTED BY CURRICULAR AFFAIRS}{\caps 
\par }{
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {
\par }\pard \widctlpar\tx1440\adjustright {MOTION:  
\par ======
\par 
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {The ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Faculty Senate moves to amend the "Academic Bankruptcy for Returning Students" policy (Pg. 13-14, 2003-04 Catalog) as follows:
\par }\pard \widctlpar\tx1440\adjustright {
\par 
\par CAPS = additions
\par [[  ]]  = deletions
\par 
\par 
\par }{\b [[Academic Bankruptcy]] FRESH START for Returning Students
\par }{
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {If you performed at an academic level that made you ineligible to continue your studies at ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ and dropped out or were dismissed from school, [[academic bankruptcy]] FRESH START can offer you a new undergraduate [[}{\cf1 s
tart}{
]] BEGINNING.  You may apply for readmission on the basis that your prior academic record be disregarded.  You begin your college study again with no credits attempted, no credits earned and no quality points reflected in subsequent grade point average
 calculations.  You may use [[}{\cf1 academic bankruptcy}{]] FRESH START only once.\tab 
\par 
\par }\pard\plain \s29\widctlpar\adjustright \cgrid {\f7 To declare [[academic bankruptcy]] FRESH START, you must submit an Application for [[Academic Bankruptcy]] FRESH START form.  Before applying for admission on this basis, at least
 two years must have elapsed since the end of the last full-time semester you attended.  [[Academic bankruptcy]] FRESH START application forms are available at the Admissions [[or Registrar's]] office
.  DISCUSSING THIS OPTION WITH AN ACADEMIC ADVISOR IS RECOMMENDED SHOULD OTHER COURSES OF ACTION BE APPROPRIATE.
\par }\pard\plain \widctlpar\adjustright \f7\cgrid {
\par Your prior academic record remains a part of your overall academic record and appears on your transcript, but none of the credits you earned previously can be used in your new program.  The only tim
e these credits will be included in GPA calculations is for graduation with honors (See Graduation with Honors}{\cf1 ).  [[You may be allowed advanced standing or a waiver of requirements just as any non-bankrupt student, but you won'
t be allowed credit by examination for courses lost in bankruptcy]].
\par }{
\par 
\par }\pard \widctlpar\tx1440\adjustright {EFFECTIVE:  \tab Fall 2004
\par 
\par }\pard \fi-720\li720\widctlpar\adjustright {RATIONALE: \tab The faculty committee who participated and 
\par \tab developed the Early Warning Program made several 
\par \tab recommendations for improving or simplifying terms and 
\par \tab procedures for ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ students.  The intent with this motion is 
\par \tab to provide a more positive framework for a process that is 
\par \tab currently in place and support the "paradigm shift from a 
\par \tab punitive approach to customer service modality that 
\par \tab incorporates a commitment to developing a personal connection 
\par \tab to the student."
\par }\pard \widctlpar\tx1440\adjustright {
\par }\pard \ri-260\widctlpar\adjustright {
\par \page ATTACHMENT 117/4
\par }{\caps ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Faculty Senate #117
\par september 22, 2003
\par }{SUBMITTED BY FACULTY DEVELOPMENT, ASSESSMENT, & IMPROVEMENT
\par }{\caps 
\par 
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {MOTION:
\par ======
\par }\pard \ri720\widctlpar\adjustright {
\par The ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Faculty Senate, upon recommendation of the Faculty Development, Assessment, and Improvement Committee, moves to establish a Faculty Travel Committee.  This committee will assist the Office of Faculty Development in the evaluat
ion of faculty development travel funding requests, and will be charged with setting the procedures for submitting requests and the criteria for evaluating requests.
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {
\par \tab EFFECTIVE:      Immediately
\par 
\par \tab RATIONALE:      Currently, faculty development travel requests 
\par \tab \tab are submitted to the Office of Faculty Development on 
\par \tab \tab an ad hoc basis and reviewed on a case-by-case basis.  
\par \tab \tab This is a very cumbersome process for the Office of 
\par \tab \tab Faculty Development Director and also does not allow for 
\par \tab \tab careful planning of the budget.  This motion establishes 
\par \tab \tab a Faculty Travel Committee, which will set rules for 
\par \tab \tab submissions of travel funding requests, set guidelines by 
\par \tab \tab which those requests will be reviewed, and assist the 
\par \tab \tab Office of Faculty Development in the review of those 
\par \tab \tab requests.
\par 
\par 
\par }\pard \ri-260\widctlpar\adjustright {\page ATTACHMENT 117/5
\par }{\caps ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Faculty Senate #117
\par September 22, 2003
\par }{SUBMITTED BY CURRICULAR AFFAIRS
\par }{\caps 
\par 
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {Minutes of the Curricular Affairs Committee
\par September 5,  12:30-1:30 , CCR
\par }\pard \ri720\widctlpar\adjustright {
\par Present:  }{\cf1 Carol A Barnhardt, Eduard Zilberkant, Jeannette Smith, Mario Kupries, Rainer Newberry, Stephen Cysewski, Susan Herman, William Schneider, Gayle Gregory, Wanda Martin, and Pete Pinney
\par 
\par 1.  Rainer Newberry was elected chair almost unanimously.
\par 
\par 2.  Meetings were set for alternate Mondays at }{\strike\cf1 1pm }{\cf1   }{\strike\cf1 3pm}{\cf1    }{\b\cf1 2 pm }{\cf1 in Wood Center Conference Room "B".
\par 
\par 3.  Bill Schneider graciously agreed to serve as Curriculum Review Chair.
\par 
\par 4.  Jeannette Smith (after some soul-searching) graciously agreed to serve on the Ad Hoc Unit Criteria Committee.
\par 
\par 5.  Bill Schneider asked 'where is our student representative?' and agreed to make contact with ASÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ to get one.
\par 
\par 6.  The committee unanimously approved the request for DOD Firefighter Certification to be transferable as FIRE 207.
\par 
\par 7.  The committee unanimously approved the request for ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Paramedic License/ National Registry Paramedic Certification to be transferable to ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ as EMS 180, 182, 186, 271, 275, 277, and 283, for a total of 48 credits.
\par 
\par 8.  The issue of Syllabi Template was raised and Susan Herman kindly volunteered to email some materials on syllabi from the SOM to Committee members.  The issue will be addressed at the next meeting.
\par 
\par 9.  The issue of the Bachelor of Technology degree was raised.  Steve Cysewski strongly requested that this committee not recommend to kill the program as TVC was planning serious improvements/changes in the pro
gram soon.  The committee agreed to a no-kill zone for BT.
\par 
\par 10.  The issue of tightening up the language for excused absences was raised, as per the Provost's letter to the Faculty Senate.  The committee asked 'is this a problem' and decided to revisit the issue when someone thinks it is.
\par 
\par 11.  Pete Pinney brought up a request to change/clarify how semester honors are calculated.  He agreed to send a draft wording to the committee for its advice and consent.
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {\cf1 
\par Next meeting to be held Monday, Sept. 15, 2 p.m.
\par 
\par }\pard \ri-260\widctlpar\adjustright {
\par \page ATTACHMENT 117/6
\par }{\caps ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Faculty Senate #117
\par september 22, 2003
\par }{SUBMITTED BY FACULTY AFFAIRS
\par }{\caps 
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {
\par }\pard \ri720\widctlpar\adjustright {FACULTY AFFAIRS COMMITTEE REPORT
\par 
\par Tuesday,  02 September 2003
\par Room 122,  NSF,  2-3:15 PM
\par 
\par }{\b Committee Members Present:  
\par }{Mark Box, CLA
\par Karen Erickson, CLA
\par Joan Leguard, CLA
\par Peter McRoy, SFOS (Chair)
\par Shirish Patil, SME
\par Craig Wisen, SOM
\par Roger Smith, GI
\par Pete Pinney, Senate President (ex officio)
\par 
\par }{\b Committee Members Away:
\par }{Bret Luick, CES
\par Jennifer McBeath, SALARM
\par Dan Odess, CLA
\par }{\b 
\par }{
\par }{\b Old Business from last semester: 
\par }{The following items from last semester remain on the Faculty Affairs agenda.  The Faculty Affairs Committee discussed the items and reviewed their status.
\par 
\par 1.\tab Spouse Appointment Policy 
\par This policy was nearly ready for the Senate last semester but ran into last minute difficulties with the AA/EO.  The committee will seek further information of AA/EO to decide the fate of the policy.
\par 
\par 2.\tab Classified Research 
\par Pete Pinney  reported that the Policy on Classified and Proprietary Research has been on the desk of attorney Hostina for the summer and awaits a decision.  There are three options.  On
e is to have the chancellor allow it to become policy after the thirty-day period.  The other is to have him veto the policy and begin the reconciliation process.  The third is to grant another extension.  Everything goes in thirty day cycles except for t
he reconciliation policy, which has no dates attached.  An extension until 15 September is likely after which the policy will be returned to Faculty Affairs for the week before the full Senate meeting on 22 September.
\par 
\par 3.\tab Parking & the Master Planning Committee
\par Last year the Master Planning Committee created a subcommittee on parking.  The committee is chaired by Shirish Patil who reported that the report of the new planning consultants will soon be available (see Attachment 1).  The FA Committee discussed t
he West Ridge construction and many of the problems associated with that project were aired.  A general question was raised as to whether the Master Planning Committee is responsive to comments and needs of faculty, staff and students.  Does the parking s
ubcommittee deal with operations as well as planning?  Should they?  What is the relationship between the Faculty Senate and the Master Planning Committee?  These issues will be on the agenda for Faculty Affairs.
\par 
\par 4.\tab Unit Criteria 
\par Dan Odess will continue serving as the FA representative on the Unit Criteria Committee.
\par }\pard \li720\ri720\widctlpar\adjustright {
\par }\pard \ri720\widctlpar\adjustright {5.\tab Budget Liaison
\par }\pard\plain \s28\ri720\widctlpar\adjustright \loch\af4\hich\af4\dbch\f4\cgrid {\hich\af7\dbch\af4\loch\f7 
Craig Wisen has been appointed by President Pinney to be budget liaison for this academic year.  Faculty Affairs will continue to pursue ways for the Senate to be more invol\hich\af7\dbch\af4\loch\f7 ved in the budget process.
\par }\pard\plain \li720\ri720\widctlpar\adjustright \f7\cgrid {
\par }\pard\plain \s28\fi-720\li720\ri720\widctlpar\adjustright \loch\af4\hich\af4\dbch\f4\cgrid {\b \hich\af7\dbch\af4\loch\f7 New Business
\par }\pard\plain \ri720\widctlpar\adjustright \f7\cgrid {
\par 6.\tab ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Budget Outcomes-Based Budgeting 
\par President Pinney has given this proposal from the statewide administration a very high priority. Faculty were not involved in the initial process but after some negotiation b
y the Faculty Alliance  the procedures will be  revised to include faculty opinion. A statement from President Pinney will be forthcoming.
\par 
\par 7.\tab Emeritus Qualification
\par Procedures regarding appointment of emeriti faculty are again an issue.  The provost asks 
should there be a time limit on appointments after retirement, i.e. a sunset on eligibility for appointment?  Also current policy allows active or retired faculty to nominate emeriti.  Should at least some of the nominees be active faculty?  These issues 
will be reviewed by Faculty Affairs.
\par }\pard \li1620\ri720\widctlpar\adjustright {
\par }\pard \ri720\widctlpar\adjustright {8.\tab Fast Track Tenure issue
\par The provost also notes that procedures for fast track tenure appointments for new hires have raised some questions.  Faculty Affairs will review this issue for clarification and/or policy change. 
\par 
\par Submitted by Peter McRoy
\par 
\par 
\par }{\b Attachment 1:
\par }\pard\plain \s1\ri720\keepn\widctlpar\outlinelevel0\adjustright \b\fs20\ul\cgrid {\f7 Report of the Subcommittee on Parking / submitted by Shirish Patil
\par }\pard\plain \ri720\widctlpar\adjustright \f7\cgrid {The purpose of the Circulation and Parking Plan is to provide additional guidance toward implementing the transportation related items in the 
Master Plan.  To this end, ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ formed the Circulation and Parking Subcommittee (CPS) to identify specific issues and mitigation measures to address near-term and long-term needs related to pedestrians and bicycles, the ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ shuttle system, motor vehicle ci
r
culation, and the parking system.  As such, this project required technical data collection and analysis, as well as a qualitative review of the issues and potential improvements.  CPS hired a team of consultants (consultant team was selected from seven p
r
oposals that were submitted to ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ as a response to RFP) to provide expertise in the areas of transportation planning, traffic engineering, economics and finance, and landscape architecture.  A public involvement process was undertaken, which included two
 
public meetings and an on-line survey posted on the ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ web site.  Additional comments were taken directly by members of the CPS.  Implementation actions were evaluated for both technical soundness and appropriateness for the character and goals of the ca
m
pus community.  The resulting Plan includes a wide range of measures to improve circulation and parking throughout the ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ campus.  It also includes a range of strategies, from significant infrastructure changes to pedestrian enhancements to modified park
i
ng management measures.  Many of the measures are tied to existing campus plans, such as the completing Tanana Loop, constructing Thompson Drive, as well as to building sites identified for future development.  In addition, changes to the existing parking
 
permit system are identified to optimize use of existing facilities.  The major recommendations are summarized in the Final Report.  The final report should be available on the web after all revisions are made (I expect that to happen sometime late Septem
ber).
\par 
\par Way Forward:
\par 
\par The tentative plan for the Public Meeting for CPS Final Plan with KAI is as below (pending confirmation for date from KAI):
\par 
\par CPS will hold a public meeting on Monday, Sept 29.  There will be two meetings, both at the Wood Center (a morn
ing one, 9-12am time frame and an evening one from 6-9pm time frame).  Each meeting will be for no more than two hours.  The plan is to have a formal presentation of the plan (power point) by KAI in the first half hour in the Wood Center Ball Room (NO que
stion/answer session) to educate the constituents about the plan, followed by an display open meeting in Wood Center ground level area.  Same format will be repeated in the evening.
\par 
\par The announcements regarding the meetings will appear in Sept 19 Cornerstone, Daily News Miner, Sun Star and campus wide e-mails to Deans and Directors.
\par 
\par CPS will put up a web feedback form with a new email address for the campus/community feedback on the report and public meeting.
\par 
\par Both sessions are scheduled as on campus events due to poor show at the Noel Wien Library during last open house.
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {
\par 
\par }\pard \ri-260\widctlpar\adjustright {\page }{ATTACHMENT 117/7
\par }{\caps ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Faculty Senate #117
\par September 22, 2003
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {SUBMITTED BY}{
\par Graduate Academic & Advisory Committee Meeting, 
\par Sept. 3 2003, 1 pm-1:45 p.m.
\par }\pard \ri720\widctlpar\adjustright {
\par Present:  C. Koverola, C. Mulder, D. Reynolds, D. Stephens, M. Ehrlander, M. Hogan, M. Murray, S. Henrichs, J. Ma, G. Gregory, C. McAlpin, R. Nicholson, R. Gradinger, A. Dandekar.
\par 
\par 1.\tab Christa Mulder was elected the chair for 2003-2004.
\par 
\par 2.\tab A regular meeting time was set for Fridays 3:30 p.m.
\par 
\par 3.\tab We briefly discussed three items brought up by the Graduate School as issues the GAAC should look into in the coming year:
\par }\pard \fi-720\li1440\ri720\widctlpar\adjustright {a.\tab 
Tuition waivers for graduate school.  Susan Henrichs explained that currently there are no limitations on what courses graduate students can sign up for when they receive a tuition waiver.  Sometimes these courses are clearly not relevant to the student
\rquote s degree program, and this results in a cost to the university.  Several methods for restricting waivers to relevant courses were discussed.
\par b.\tab Program policies on maintaining status in the graduate program.  We will be examining CSEM's draft policy at a future meeting.
\par c.\tab Discrepancies between individual programs in the requirements for 698:  6 credits (catalog) vs. 3-6 credits (a number of programs).  
\par }\pard \ri720\widctlpar\adjustright {
\par All three items were tabled for more extensive discussion until the following meeting, to be held on Sept. 19.
\par 
\par 
\par \page ATTACHMENT 117/8}{
\par }{\caps ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Faculty Senate #117
\par September 22, 2003
\par }{SUBMITTED BY FACULTY APPEALS & OVERSIGHT
\par }{
\par 
\par On May 14, 2003, the Faculty Appeals and Oversight Committee met with Chancellor Marshall Lind and Dr. Eduard Zilberkant, Chair of the ad-hoc committee for Provost Review.  FAOC members present were
 Paul Layer (chair), Carol Gold, and Larry Duffy (there were problems with the bridge so we could not contact remote sites).  The meeting convened at 2:00 PM.  Chancellor Lind summarized his evaluation of the Provost.  It was his impression that the ad-ho
c
 committee report highlighted many of the strengths and weaknesses of the Provost and his report echoed these points.  The Chancellor and the Provost have met and will continue to meet to take steps to address the issues raised.  The meeting adjourned at 
approximately 2:30 PM.  The FAOC would like to thank Dr. Zilberkant and the other members of the ad-hoc committee for their work.  This concludes the administrator review process for the 2002-2003 academic year.
\par 
\par }\pard \ri-260\widctlpar\adjustright {
\par \page ATTACHMENT 117/9
\par }{\caps ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Faculty Senate #117
\par September 22, 2003
\par }{SUBMITTED BY FACULTY APPEALS & OVERSIGHT
\par }{\caps 
\par }{
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {Faculty Appeals and Oversight Committee Report
\par 
\par Meeting Date:  September 3, 2003
\par 
\par Present (in person or by teleconference):
\par Carol Gold, Robert Gorman, Brian Himelbloom, Paul Layer, Allan Morotti,
\par Brenda Norcross, Mike Pippenger, Julie Riley
\par 
\par Notes:
\par }\pard \ri810\widctlpar\adjustright {
\par Paul Layer was elected committee chair
\par Julie Riley was elected to serve on the ad-hoc committee for Unit Criteria
\par 
\par The committee then discussed plans for the upcoming year:
\par 
\par 1.  The committee discussed the process for Group B administrator review.  This year Doug Kane, Roger Smith, Aldona Jonaitis, Clara Johnson and Tony Nakazawa are up for review.  At the next meeting we will select chairs for each review committee a
nd set up a review process.  Dean Collins is up for Group A administrative review, and members of the committee will be asked by the Provost to serve on that ad hoc committee.
\par 
\par 2.  The chair discussed the issues regarding grade appeals policy time-line concerns and student code of conduct violation questions.  Each committee member will review current policy so that we can discuss it at the next meeting.
\par 
\par 3.  The chair discussed the excused absence policy and requested that committee members familiarize themselves with the current policy.  We will work on language for a change to the catalog.
\par 
\par The next meeting will be on Monday afternoon, October 6 at 1:30 in the Rasmuson Library, Room 341.  
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {
\par }\pard \ri-260\widctlpar\adjustright {
\par \page ATTACHMENT 117/10
\par }{\caps ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Faculty Senate #117
\par september 22, 2003
\par }{SUBMITTED BY FACULTY DEVELOPMENT, ASSESSMENT & IMPROVEMENT
\par }{\caps 
\par }\pard \ri720\widctlpar\adjustright {
\par Minutes of Faculty Development, Assessment, and Improvement Committee Meeting
\par Wednesday, 3 September 2003 / 3:30 p.m.
\par Office of Faculty Development, 222 Bunnell
\par 
\par Committee Members Present:  Gerald Berman, Lee Haugen, John Kawula, Paul McCarthy, Joy Morrison, Michael Nakaneczny, Channon Price, Larry Roberts, E. Thomas Robinson, Shunpu Zhang
\par 
\par Committee Members Absent:  Mike Davis, Brian Barnes, Roger Norris-Tull
\par 
\par Guests present:  Pete Pinney
\par 
\par }\pard \fi-540\li540\ri720\widctlpar\adjustright {1.   Paul McCarthy was elected to serve as Chair of the committee for this academic year.
\par 
\par 2.   The committee agreed to a regular meeting time (8:30-9:30 am, Thursday) and scheduled the next meeting for Thursday, 25 September at 8:30 am in 222 Bunnell (Office of Faculty Development).
\par 
\par 3.   Shunpu Zhang agreed to serve on the Senate's ad hoc committee on unit criteria.
\par 
\par 4.   Joy Morrison updated the committee on this year's orientation schedule for new faculty, the list of faculty development training workshops, and the faculty development web site.  She also indicated to the committee that t
he Faculty Development Office has a budget of ~52K this year.  This level of funds is reduced from previous years which means that fewer funds may be available for faculty travel than in past years.
\par 
\par 5.   Joy Morrison reiterated the difficulty that she is 
having dealing with individual faculty travel requests and asked that the committee establish a faculty travel policy.  A subcommittee on faculty travel was established last year and a series of recommendations were sent to the full Senate last spring.  T
h
e Senate suggested that the committee submit a more general policy for Senate approval.  A new subcommittee on faculty travel policy, consisting of Gerald Berman, Channon Price, Lee Haugen and Shunpu Zhang, was established to work with the travel policy d
evised by the subcommittee last year and develop a more general document that could be sent to the full Senate for approval as soon as possible.
\par 
\par 6.   Joy Morrison indicated that she would be attending the POD (Professional & Organizational Development) Conference in Denver on October 8-12 and requested a volunteer from the committee to join her in attending that meeting. 
\par 
\par 7.   The committee discussed past work on IAS forms.  Tom Robinson suggested that Hild Peters be invited to serve on the committee, as s
he was a member in past years.  Her attendance would allow interaction in the important area of instructional assessment.  Joy Morrison noted that Hild Peters has included a form in the IAS packets that better explains their role to students and faculty, 
but that that is unlikely to be sufficient to deal with concerns raised by Jordan Titus last year.  
\par 
\par 8.   It was noted that Susan Henrichs is responsible for outcomes assessment.  Joy Morrison asked Pete Pinney if he would ask Susan to join our committee since we oversee policy on Faculty Assessment also.
\par 
\par 9.   The meeting was adjourned at 4:20 p.m.
\par 
\par }\pard \widctlpar\adjustright {
\par }}