The 1950s are called the ‘termination era’ in federal Indian policy because Congress adopted policies aimed at terminating federal obligations to tribes. The three main tools the federal government used to accomplish this were the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) relocation program, actual termination of some tribes, and by extending state jurisdiction into Indian country through Public Law 280.
Relocation Programs: Relocating people from reservations and villages into the urban U.S. cities for training and employment became a general trend after World War II. Indian Commissioner Glen Emmons started the BIA Relocation Program in 1948. In 1951 ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Delegate Bartlett praised the ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ relocation program on the floor of Congress, calling for its expansion. By 1953 relocations had reached 2,600, and they peaked in 1957 with some 7,000. By 1960 a total of 33,466 American Indian and ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ Native people had been relocated.
Terminating Tribal Status: Congress passed House Concurrent Resolution 108 (HCR 108) in 1953 which called for ending the special federal relationship with tribes and terminating their status as tribes as rapidly as possible. Over 100 tribes were terminated under this policy, and over a million acres of land were removed from trust status. Some tribes later regained their tribal status such as the Menominee Tribe in Wisconsin. No tribes in ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ were terminated under this policy.
Public Law 280: Public Law 280 (P.L. 280) was an Act passed by Congress in 1953 which extended state criminal and some civil jurisdiction into Indian country in certain named states. In those states, P.L. 280 transferred federal law enforcement authority to state authority in Indian country. Without P.L. 280, these matters were dealt with by either tribal and/or federal law enforcement. P.L. 280 was an attempt by the federal government to reduce its role in Indian affairs. State dissatisfaction with the law was focused on the failure of the Act to provide funding for their new authority to enforce criminal law in Indian country. Tribes affected by P.L. 280 saw it as undermining tribal sovereignty because it was imposed on them without tribal consent, or even consultation. Public Law 280 has caused a great deal of confusion over jurisdiction in the states where it applies.
Public Law 280 was applied to ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ, with the exception of the Metlakatla Indian Reservation. The State of ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ argued for many years that P.L. 280 terminated tribal jurisdiction, but court decisions have consistently ruled that it did not. Public Law 280 did not limit or diminish any tribal jurisdiction in the states where it applies. However, much tribal jurisdiction runs concurrently with the state, meaning both states and tribes share jurisdiction over many matters.
There is little Indian country in ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ, so the application of P.L. 280 does not have a great effect on the ground. ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ State law enforcement will continue to pursue major crimes everywhere in ÃÛÌÒÓ°Ïñ, in the villages and on all types of Native lands. One damaging effect of P.L. 280, however, is a policy by the Bureau of Indian Affairs to not fund to operation of tribal courts in states where Public Law 280 applies, which reduces access to justice and judicial services.
| << Back | Next >> |